Why does he have two pairs of butt cheeks in two different places.... If you need some help with the figure stuff I can help.

--
"Remember there's a thin line between being a hero, and being a memory." -Prime

Well you actually do have two seperate butt muscles in each cheek, but I was going for a type of Roman "idealism" in my art, where the human body has reached perfection, so I tried to show that....as weird as it does look.

--
See there's this place in me where your fingerprints still rest, your kisses still linger, and your whispers softly echo. It's the place where a part of you will forever be a part of me.

Whatever, just tryin' to help.

--
"Remember there's a thin line between being a hero, and being a memory." -Prime

Oh and I'm grateful for that, i was just trying to explain why i drew it the way I did.

--
See there's this place in me where your fingerprints still rest, your kisses still linger, and your whispers softly echo. It's the place where a part of you will forever be a part of me.

from
Well, the butt does look weird... why don't you post a link to your reference, then it would be easier to point out mistakes.
I'm sorry I can't be of any real help - I don't know too much about anatomy myself

--
Pencil Portrait Comissions? Click me!
Want to meet German Deviants? ~GetTogether
Helpful comments and critiques? #GimmeFeedback
Bored? FreeRice.com

Reminds me of Chris Cunnigham's "Rubber Johnny".

:gimmefeedback:
I might be of a bit of help but I can assure you thatmy anatomy knowing it's enough to help you here. Could you please post the refernce, btw, so I can be of greater help?

Kinda tricky what you tried to pull out in here. You used perspective on the body besides some hard anatomy. There's not many people capable to pull out this, so I'd say your try was pretty good.

For a start, I'd say that the head it's a bit too big (dun worry, this is easy to fix) and that the chest muscles are too square looking too; normally they're more rectangular looking, in a horizontal understanding of the rectangle. And even if you were going for the roman kind of perfect body, you did invent some "bumps" (does that make sense? My english is bad) in the right part of the back. I reccomend you to use ore or less straight lines, and then add the curves, never as exagerated as that. I can see what you were trying to do in the arms, but you got the shoulders muscles wrong; they should be looking upwards, behind the arm.
I can't really give feedback on the pelvis and leg, since I tend to fail at those >.<

PD: If you want some good refernces check :lastscionz: -comic stylish but he is a god when it comes to anatomy+perspective and you could check this page too [link]

PD2: I'm sorry for not helping you more, but I feel that my english isn't just enough.

--
Sorry for my poor english - Carpe Diem!

looks like a study from a Burne Hogarth book, well done tho, keep at it.

--
[link] Mobiusbandwidth.com, one stop shopping for progressive music, art and thought.

From

OK, here goes.

The front leg looks too skinny, compared to the main body. As it appears the knee and lower leg are the closest thing to the viewer, but they are very small at the same time. The lower leg should gain more thickness to match the viewpoint and the rest of the body. The knee also - it should look at least as big as the head would.

You should check the clavicles, though it could be correct from that angle (not sure).

Not bad otherwise

--
Now you're messing with a son of a bitch!

~GimmeFeedback =PortraitPencilArt *TraditionalArt *Traditional-Artists *RealismClub =blackandwhiteclub ~lowtech-artists ~Club-Bulgaria